Trade Strategy & Risk Mitigation

Nearshoring

Nearshoring Moving production or sourcing closer to a company's primary market to reduce costs and risks.

Also Known As:Regional Sourcing, Proximity Sourcing, Close-Proximity Manufacturing
Last Updated:April 2025

What It Means

Nearshoring Simplified

Nearshoring means relocating your business operations to countries that are geographically closer to your main market instead of distant overseas locations. For U.S. companies, this typically means moving production from Asia to Mexico, Central America, or Canada. The goal is to get the benefits of lower costs compared to domestic production while avoiding the long shipping times, higher freight costs, and complex logistics of doing business across oceans. It's like finding a middle ground between keeping everything at home (reshoring) and sending it all far away (offshoring).

Nearshoring has gained significant momentum since 2020 as businesses seek to balance cost considerations with increasing concerns about supply chain resilience. The approach addresses several key challenges that emerged from extended global supply chains, including lengthy transit times, complex logistics coordination, and vulnerability to international disruptions.

For U.S. companies, nearshoring typically involves shifting production or sourcing from distant regions like Asia to closer locations such as Mexico, Central America, or Canada. This geographical proximity offers advantages including reduced shipping times, lower transportation costs, greater operational control, and time zone alignment for better communication and coordination.

Historical Timeline

1980s-1990s

Globalization Era

Companies prioritize cost minimization through distant offshoring, primarily to Asia

1994

NAFTA Implementation

North American Free Trade Agreement creates foundation for regional supply chains

2008-2011

Financial Crisis Impact

Economic uncertainty prompts initial reconsideration of extended global supply chains

2010s

Rising Asian Labor Costs

Wage increases in China and other Asian manufacturing hubs reduce cost advantages of distant offshoring

2018-2019

U.S.-China Trade Tensions

Tariffs and trade uncertainty accelerate consideration of nearshoring alternatives

2020

COVID-19 Disruption

Pandemic severely disrupts global supply chains, highlighting vulnerabilities of distant sourcing

2020

USMCA Implementation

Updated North American trade agreement strengthens regional manufacturing framework

2021-2023

Investment Surge

Major manufacturing investments in Mexico and other nearshore locations as companies implement regionalization strategies

2024-2025

Nearshoring Incentives

Governments introduce new tax incentives and industrial policies to attract nearshoring investment

Real-World Example

Case Study: AutoParts Inc.'s Manufacturing Realignment to Mexico

Company Background

AutoParts Inc. is a mid-sized automotive components manufacturer supplying precision-engineered parts to major automobile assembly plants across North America. With annual revenues of approximately $420 million, the company produces a range of components including electronic control modules, sensors, and specialized interior parts. Prior to 2020, the company operated facilities in Michigan, Tennessee, and Guangdong, China, with the Chinese facility handling 65% of total production.

The Challenge

By late 2019, AutoParts Inc. was facing multiple challenges with its China-based manufacturing:

  • Section 301 tariffs had increased landed costs of China-sourced components by 25%
  • Shipping times of 30-45 days were hampering ability to respond to changing customer demands
  • Rising Chinese labor and compliance costs had reduced the cost advantage
  • Coordination across 13-hour time zone differences created operational challenges
  • Intellectual property protection concerns were increasing

These issues were compounded when the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global supply chains in early 2020. The company experienced a complete shutdown of its Chinese operations for nearly three months, causing it to miss key delivery deadlines to major customers and incur substantial penalties. Even after production resumed, shipping lanes remained constrained with container costs increasing by over 500% and transit times extending to 60+ days in some cases.

The Nearshoring Decision

Location Analysis

AutoParts Inc. conducted a comprehensive analysis of potential nearshoring locations, considering multiple factors:

  • Proximity to major customers (primarily in southern U.S. automotive corridors)
  • Labor costs and skill availability
  • Logistics infrastructure quality
  • Tariff and trade agreement benefits
  • Existing supplier ecosystem
  • Political and economic stability

After evaluating options including Canada, Mexico, Costa Rica, and domestic expansion, the company selected Monterrey, Mexico as its primary nearshoring destination.

Decisive Factors

Monterrey offered several compelling advantages:

  • Established automotive manufacturing ecosystem with tier-2 and tier-3 suppliers already present
  • Labor costs approximately 30% of U.S. rates but with experienced manufacturing workforce
  • Modern industrial parks with reliable power and connectivity
  • Just 2-3 days shipping time to major customer assembly plants
  • USMCA benefits eliminating tariffs on qualifying goods
  • One-hour time difference from company headquarters, enabling real-time coordination
  • Existing pool of engineering talent from local technical universities
  • Established logistics infrastructure with major shipping carriers and freight forwarders

Implementation Strategy

Rather than attempting an immediate complete transition, AutoParts Inc. developed a phased approach:

Phase Timeline Key Activities
1: Pilot Facility Q3 2020 - Q1 2021
  • Leased 40,000 sq ft facility in established industrial park
  • Relocated select equipment from China operation
  • Hired core management team and initial workforce of 50 employees
  • Transferred production of highest-margin, most time-sensitive components
2: Main Facility Development Q2 2021 - Q4 2021
  • Broke ground on 120,000 sq ft purpose-built facility
  • Established local supply chain for raw materials and basic components
  • Expanded workforce to 150 employees
  • Implemented quality management systems and earned ISO certifications
  • Began full-scale production of most component families
3: Complete Transition Q1 2022 - Q3 2022
  • Phased closure of China facility
  • Transfer of remaining equipment and production lines
  • Full staffing of Mexico operation to 280 employees
  • Implementation of advanced automation systems
  • Established R&D center co-located with production

Results and Impact

Operational Benefits
  • Reduced shipping time from 30-45 days to 2-3 days
  • Decreased transportation costs by 62%
  • Eliminated Section 301 tariffs (25% cost savings)
  • Reduced inventory carrying costs by $4.2 million annually
  • Improved on-time delivery rate from 76% to 94%
  • Enhanced quality metrics with defect rate decreasing by 15%
Strategic Advantages
  • Increased responsiveness to customer design changes
  • Improved collaboration with U.S. R&D team
  • Better protection of intellectual property
  • Enhanced ability to customize products
  • Reduced exposure to international shipping disruptions
  • Easier compliance with USMCA regional content requirements
  • Greater operational control and oversight
Financial Outcomes
  • 6% net decrease in total production costs
  • 8% increase in gross margins
  • Initial capital investment recovered in 18 months
  • New customer acquisition increased by 22%
  • Stock price increased 34% following completion
  • Annual revenue growth of 17% vs. 8% industry average
  • Higher valuation multiples from reduced risk profile

Key Takeaway: AutoParts Inc.'s nearshoring initiative demonstrates how companies can effectively reduce supply chain vulnerabilities while simultaneously improving operational performance and financial results. By taking a phased approach, leveraging regional trade benefits, and addressing challenges proactively, the company transformed a supply chain disruption into a strategic advantage. The case highlights the importance of considering total landed costs—not just labor rates—when making manufacturing location decisions, and shows how proximity to end markets creates both tangible and intangible benefits.

Key Facts

Core ConceptRelocating production and supply operations to countries geographically close to the target market
Key BenefitsReduced shipping times, lower logistics costs, easier oversight, time zone compatibility, and tariff advantages
Popular DestinationsFor U.S. companies: Mexico, Canada, Costa Rica, Colombia; For European firms: Eastern Europe, Turkey, Morocco
Transportation ImpactSignificantly reduced transit times (days vs. weeks) and lower freight costs compared to distant offshoring
Trade AgreementsOften leverages regional trade agreements like USMCA/NAFTA to reduce or eliminate tariffs
Labor ConsiderationsHigher labor costs than distant offshoring but offset by reduced logistics expenses and greater productivity
Environmental ImpactGenerally reduces carbon footprint through shorter shipping distances and potentially cleaner energy grids
COVID-19 EffectPandemic accelerated nearshoring trends as companies sought to reduce supply chain vulnerabilities