Retaliatory Tariffs
Retaliatory Tariffs Import duties imposed by a country in response to tariffs or other trade restrictions placed on its exports by another country. These are defensive measures designed to pressure the original country to remove its tariffs.
Latest Update (March 2025)
The EU has announced it will maintain reduced retaliatory tariffs on U.S. steel and aluminum products, pending further progress in bilateral negotiations on excess capacity issues.
Read European Commission StatementWhat It Means
Retaliatory tariffs are "tit-for-tat" import taxes that one country imposes on another country's goods in response to tariffs placed on its own exports. Think of them as a country saying, "If you tax our products, we'll tax yours too," creating economic pressure to force the other country to reconsider its original tariffs.
Strategic Considerations
Countries carefully select products for retaliatory tariffs to maximize political and economic impact:
Symbolic Products
Items strongly associated with the target country (e.g., bourbon whiskey from Kentucky, Harley-Davidson motorcycles from Wisconsin)
Political Pressure
Products from regions with political influence (e.g., agricultural goods from key electoral states)
Substitutability
Products that can be sourced elsewhere to minimize domestic harm while maximizing pressure
Impact on Business
Retaliatory tariffs create disruption throughout supply chains:
Exporters
- Face higher prices in foreign markets
- May lose market share to competitors
- Often forced to absorb costs or relocate production
Importers & Consumers
- Pay higher prices for imported goods
- May shift to alternative suppliers
- Face reduced product selection
Unlike other tariffs with revenue or protection goals, retaliatory tariffs are primarily designed to create economic and political pressure to resolve trade disputes.
Historical Timeline
WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding
WTO framework established formal rules for authorized retaliation after dispute settlement
EU Banana Retaliation
First major authorized WTO retaliation: U.S. imposed $191 million in tariffs on EU goods in banana dispute
Steel Safeguard Retaliation
EU, Japan, China, and others threatened $2.2 billion in retaliatory tariffs against U.S. steel safeguards
Section 232 Retaliation
Canada, EU, Mexico, and others imposed retaliatory tariffs against U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs
WTO Airbus Ruling
U.S. authorized to impose $7.5 billion in retaliatory tariffs on EU goods in aircraft subsidy dispute
U.S.-EU Aerospace Tariff Suspension
Five-year suspension of retaliatory tariffs in Boeing-Airbus dispute as part of broader trade negotiations
Real-World Example
Case Study: EU Retaliation to U.S. Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariffs
Background
In March 2018, the United States imposed tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum imports from various countries, including EU member states, citing national security concerns under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The EU disputed that justification and developed a retaliation strategy.
The EU's Strategic Response
The European Commission designed a carefully targeted list of products for retaliatory tariffs worth €2.8 billion, including:
Symbolic American Products
- Bourbon whiskey (significant in Kentucky, home state of Senate Majority Leader)
- Harley-Davidson motorcycles (based in Wisconsin, then-Speaker of the House's state)
- Levi's jeans (iconic American product)
Agricultural Products
- Corn (important in Midwestern swing states)
- Rice (significant in Arkansas)
- Cranberries and orange juice (important in politically significant states)
Implementation Strategy
The EU's approach included two phases:
- Immediate retaliation on €2.8 billion of goods (implemented June 2018)
- Planned second phase targeting an additional €3.6 billion (held in reserve)
The EU carefully calibrated its response to be WTO-compatible by matching the estimated damage to EU exports (€6.4 billion) while maintaining political pressure.
Business Impact Examples
Harley-Davidson
- Faced 25% EU tariffs on motorcycles
- Estimated $90-100 million annual cost impact
- Announced shift of some production outside the U.S. to avoid tariffs
- Stock price dropped 6% following announcement
American Whiskey
- Faced 25% EU tariffs
- EU exports fell 33% in the year following tariffs
- Small distillers particularly hard hit
- Created strong industry pressure on lawmakers
Outcome
The retaliatory tariffs contributed to several developments:
- Increased political pressure from affected U.S. industries
- Temporary agreement in 2021 to partially suspend tariffs while negotiating a longer-term solution
- October 2021 agreement to replace Section 232 tariffs with a Tariff-Rate Quota system for EU steel and aluminum
- EU suspended its retaliatory tariffs following the agreement
This case demonstrates how strategically targeted retaliatory tariffs can create sufficient economic and political pressure to bring parties to the negotiating table and achieve at least partial resolution of trade disputes.
Retaliatory Tariff Calculator
Estimate the impact of current retaliatory tariffs on your import or export operations.
Calculate Tariff ImpactIs your business affected by retaliatory tariffs?
Our trade experts can help you navigate tariff challenges and identify mitigation strategies.
Get Strategic Guidance