WTO & International Trade Rules

Tariff Concession

Tariff Concession A commitment by a country to reduce or eliminate import duties on specific products during trade negotiations. These are formalized in schedules of concessions under WTO agreements or bilateral/regional trade deals.

Also Known As:Trade Concession, Duty Reduction, Tariff Commitment
Last Updated:April 2025

Latest Update (February 2025)

Recent WTO ministerial meetings have focused on reviving multilateral tariff concessions for environmental goods as part of climate negotiations, though differences remain on product coverage.

Read WTO Press Release

What It Means

A tariff concession is a promise that a country makes during trade negotiations to lower or remove its import taxes on specific products. Think of it as saying, "We'll charge less (or nothing) to import your goods," in exchange for similar benefits from trading partners. These mutual promises, once formalized, help reduce barriers to international trade.

Key Concepts

Reciprocity

Trade concessions operate on a give-and-take basis, with countries trading tariff reductions in areas of mutual interest

Binding Commitments

Once formalized, concessions become legally binding obligations under WTO rules or trade agreements

Product Specificity

Concessions apply to particular products, defined by tariff line codes, rather than blanket reductions

Negotiated Access

Provides more predictable market access as countries can't arbitrarily increase tariffs on concession items

Types of Concessions

Tariff concessions take several forms:

Multilateral (WTO) Concessions

  • Made during global trade rounds (e.g., Uruguay Round)
  • Apply to all WTO members equally (MFN principle)
  • Recorded in each country's Schedule of Concessions
  • Cover thousands of product categories

Bilateral/Regional Concessions

  • Made between specific countries in FTAs
  • Apply only to participating agreement members
  • Often deeper cuts than multilateral concessions
  • May include phase-in periods for sensitive items

Important: Modified concessions require compensation through reduced tariffs on other products to maintain the overall balance of concessions.

Historical Timeline

October 1947

GATT Signing

First multilateral tariff concessions exchanged among 23 founding contracting parties

May 1964

Kennedy Round Launched

First major post-GATT negotiating round, resulting in average 35% tariff concessions

September 1986

Uruguay Round Begins

Most ambitious negotiating round covering tariffs and many other trade issues

April 1994

Uruguay Round Completed

Significant tariff reductions averaging 40%, establishment of WTO

November 2001

Doha Round Launched

Focused on development needs of poorer countries, still not fully concluded

December 2013

Bali Package Agreement

WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement includes some tariff concessions on agricultural products

Real-World Example

Case Study: Tariff Concessions in the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS)

Background

The U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS), implemented in 2012, provides a practical example of how tariff concessions work in a bilateral context. Before KORUS, Korea maintained relatively high tariffs on many U.S. exports, particularly agricultural products and automobiles.

Key Tariff Concessions

Product Pre-FTA Tariff Concession Phase-In Period
Automobiles (Korea) 8% 0% 5 years
Beef (Korea) 40% 0% 15 years
Trucks (U.S.) 25% 0% 10 years
Electronic Equipment (Both) Various (0-8%) 0% Immediate

Negotiation Balance: The concessions were carefully balanced to provide mutual benefits, with some Korean high-tariff sectors (like beef) receiving long phase-in periods in exchange for immediate access to other U.S. markets.

Implementation Mechanism

Legal Implementation

Each country codified the agreed concessions in their tariff schedules through domestic legislation: the U.S. through the KORUS Implementation Act and Korea through its Customs Act amendments.

Administrative Process

Customs agencies in both countries programmed their systems to recognize imports under KORUS, requiring importers to provide certificates of origin to qualify for preferential rates.

Business Impact

U.S. Auto Parts Supplier

Midwestern Auto Components, a U.S. manufacturer of specialized vehicle parts, experienced the following changes after KORUS tariff concessions were implemented:

  • Korean tariffs on their products dropped from 8% to 0% over 3 years
  • Export sales to Korea increased by 35% within 4 years
  • Company established a Korean sales office and distribution center
  • Hired 28 new employees at U.S. manufacturing facility
Korean Electronics Manufacturer

Seoul Electronics, a Korean producer of consumer electronic devices, benefited from KORUS concessions through:

  • Immediate duty elimination on components imported from the U.S.
  • 6% reduction in manufacturing costs for U.S.-bound products
  • Increased competitiveness against Japanese and Chinese competitors
  • 15% higher U.S. market share within 5 years of implementation

Renegotiation Experience

In 2018, the U.S. and Korea renegotiated certain aspects of KORUS, demonstrating how tariff concessions can be modified:

Concession Modification

Korea agreed to double its import quota for U.S. automobiles that meet U.S. (rather than Korean) safety standards from 25,000 to 50,000 vehicles per manufacturer per year

Concession Extension

The U.S. agreed to extend the phase-out period for the 25% truck tariff from 2021 to 2041, maintaining protection for U.S. manufacturers for an additional 20 years

This case study illustrates how tariff concessions work in practice: they're negotiated reciprocally, implemented gradually, create tangible business opportunities, and can be modified when necessary through mutual agreement to address changing economic and political conditions.

Concession Impact Calculator

Calculate potential duty savings from tariff concessions for your imported products.

Calculate Savings

Need help understanding tariff concessions?

Our trade policy experts can help you navigate complex tariff schedules and identify opportunities in trade agreements.

Consult a Trade Expert

Key Facts

Legal BasisGATT Article II & Article XXVIII
Common VenuesWTO Negotiations, Bilateral/Regional Trade Agreements
Implementation PeriodTypically phased in over 5-10 years for sensitive products
Common ExclusionsAgricultural products, textiles, footwear often have longer phase-ins or exclusions
Modification ProcessRequires negotiations and compensation to affected trading partners
Enforcement MechanismWTO Dispute Settlement System